A possie in Aussie

March 30, 2009

Coldness of evil in hot conflicts

Filed under: race relations — nayano @ 7:48 am
Tags: , ,

Henrik at Eclectic Grounds writes about Dehumanization & Conflict: How soldiers and societies “make” violence just, and gives these insights to explain the seemingly inescapable pattern of blame and violence in the Palestinian/Israeli conflict:

Personal identity and group identity

Victims are never innocent

Moral double standards

The role of the state

The sociology of the army

and gives references for those who want to read more.

I am reminded of Gitta Sereny’s excellent, if chilling works on evil: studies of Mary Bell, a child murderer, Franz Stangl, the commandant of Treblinka, and of  Albert Speer. Chilling in more than a metaphorical sense – my main impression of the subjects of Sereny’s books is that of coldness. They come across as appallingly normal but boring people – the sort of people who leave one cold. This contrasts with the red-hot images of ‘villains’ and ‘monsters’ that are much more easy to deal with, because in our imagination they are so ‘not like us’.

See Migrant workers, the credit crunch & Nazism


March 29, 2009

Bogans out. Migrants in.

Filed under: humour,migration — nayano @ 7:04 am
Tags: , ,

It is not easy to find really funny stuff about refugees and other marginalised migrants – I wonder why? ;)

But this week I have found something funny, and worthy to actually spend money on – a t-shirt from RedBubble

F@#k off, bogans!

F@#k off, bogans!

(For those of you who don’t know, a bogan is an Australian version of a redneck).

Thanks to the blogger of T-shirts around the internet for the heads up.

And don’t forget to have a go at last week’s fun game  ‘Kick a migrant’ while you’re here.

March 27, 2009

Cheap migrant workers vs greedy capitalists: no contest

Andrew at the Bewildered Herd has once more provided a sophisticated analysis of the very latest 457 visa figures, from the State/Territory Summary Report Subclass 457 Business (Long Stay) 2008-09, Financial Year to 28 February 2009 from the Immigration Department.

Andrew concludes that

“while unemployment has hit 5.2 per cent, employment growth has slowed, job vacancies have halved and the economy has contracted, companies are employing 457 visa holders at record levels. Do the employers of 457 visa holders realise there is a global recession?

As Andrew points out, if you need to cut costs, why sack a 457 worker, who is more compliant because they rely on you to stay in Australia, and who probably do not know all their rights? Their pay and conditions will be more easily cut if the recession worsens. It makes good economic sense.

Instead of another fruitless cycle of ‘blame the foreign workers’, and ‘blame the greedy capitalist’, we need to change the 457 conditions so that the employer does not have the ability to hold residence in Australia over workers’ heads.

Then migrant workers will be able to claim their rights in the same way as other employees.

March 26, 2009

Asylum seeker numbers increase: treatment worsens

The United Nations reports that there was a 20 per cent increase in the number of people seeking asylum in Australia last year. In a recent report the UNHCR says that all developed nations have experienced a sharp increase, with United States in the lead with 49,000 claims, followed by Canada (36,900), France (35,200), Italy (31,200) and Britain (30,500).

Australia had 5,000 claims. Most asylum seekers are fleeing conflict in Afghanistan and Somalia. Asylum seeker numbers up 20pc: UN

UN: More People Seeking Asylum in Industrialized Countries

While asylum seekers in Australia will be spared the worst of the old detention and Temporary Protection system because of the Rudd government reforms, Andrew Bartlett writes today that the US and Italy have taken up “some of our past discredited, damaging, expensive and inhumane policies in the area of immigration detention” USA follows old Australian road on immigration detention.

March 25, 2009

A real life migrant game: fun for us, not them

Filed under: Immigrant workers,migration — nayano @ 7:17 am
Tags: , ,

Sociological Images brings us this chilling development in ‘border protection’: you can sit in comfort in front of your computer screen and help protect the United States against criminals!

BlueServo has provided us with Virtual Community Watch:

” an innovative real-time surveillance program designed to empower the public to proactively participate in fighting border crime.”

US citizens can already volunteer their time guarding the U.S./Mexico border against illegal immigration through the Minuteman Project.

An NPR program, A New Way To Patrol The Texas Border: Virtually, quotes a ‘Minuteman’:

“He pops a Red Bull, turns on some Black Sabbath or Steppenwolf, logs in to www.blueservo.net – and starts protecting his country. “This gives me a little edge feeling,” Fahrenkamp says, “like I’m doing something for law enforcement as well as for our own country.”

Trouble is, many of the criminals are in fact desperate people risking everything for a chance at a better life.

These cameras are directly aimed at capturing illegal immigrants: Camera-731Camera-614

I am sure they will recruit many willing volunteers. All that excitement, in safety, and feeling patriotic and manly at the same time.

March 24, 2009

African migrants: daring to hope

Filed under: African,human rights,refugee — nayano @ 6:40 am
Tags: , , , ,

I draw your attention to an article in the Australian, ‘New home, new hope’ by Drew Warne-Smith on March 23, 2009.

Drew reminds us of the so-called brawl in the Melbourne suburb of Flemington in 2007, when

“a police van on a routine patrol of Flemington, in Melbourne’s inner north, was hit by a rock as it passed a public housing estate on Racecourse Road. The estate, a series of high-rise blocks wedged between the M2 overpass and Flemington Hill, is home to a largely migrant community of about 5000, many of them African refugees. The police did a U-turn and entered the grounds, where they approached an 18-year-old Eritrean, Mubarek Mussa. But on a night when yet another grim chapter would be written in the story of African resettlement in Australia, what happened next depends on whom you ask.

Police say Mussa became “abusive” when questioned, so they arrested him. Another African teenager then “attacked” them, so they arrested him too. And when hordes of residents flooded out of the flats and surrounded police – a threatening crowd that swelled within minutes to more than 100, many trying to free the boys – the officers called for back-up.”

Drew goes to Flemington and interviews people from the largest African Australian group there, the Somalis.

These are fine interviews, well worth reading.

March 23, 2009

Race relations and Africans in Australia

Filed under: human rights,race relations — nayano @ 7:00 am
Tags: , , ,

Sunday was Harmony Day in Australia.

“The key message of Harmony Day is Everyone Belongs. It’s about community participation, inclusiveness, respect and a sense of belonging for everyone.” Diverse Australia Program

Andrew Bartlett reminds us that it was also the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and draws attention to a new project from the Human Rights Commission: African Australians: A report on human rights and social inclusion issues. african_australian_cover

A discussion paper is available for download from the Commission website, and submissions relating to the African experience of life in Australia are sought.

The two aims of the project are:

to explore the issues relating to the settlement of African Australians into the Australian community from a human rights perspective; to suggest solutions to issues raised and make recommendations to stakeholders to inform future policy, program and service design as well as public debate and education.

The Commission recently published a report instigated by concerns over the death of a 19-year-old African refugee at Noble Park Railway Station in 2007, and the comments by high profile public figures about Australian-Sudanese people before and after that incident that appeared to precipitate increased negative feeling about Australian-African migrants in the Dandenong area.

Guides to making submissions are available in all major African languages represented in Australia.

See previous posts here, especially A Stab in the Dark

March 22, 2009

Migrant workers are the bomb for Britain

Filed under: humour,Immigrant workers,migration — nayano @ 4:35 pm
Tags: , , ,

The British National Party, leaders in Britain in the field of mindless ‘They take our jobs’ rhetoric, particularly dislike Polish migrant workers, who they blame not only for taking their jobs, but lowering wages as they do it.

Their latest campaign poster, clearly designed to inflame the nationalism of a Britain under siege during World War II, features a WWII bomber.

Aviations mavens were quick to point out the unintended humour:
The bomber depicted is from the Polish regiment that fought WITH the British against the Hun.

Thanks to Context org for this Sunday fun.

battle for Britain

March 20, 2009

Web of lies against Rudd and Muslims

Filed under: race relations,refugee — nayano @ 12:55 pm
Tags: , , ,

Another of the fake and poisonous emails is doing the rounds.

Funny how they have such a long life – this one originated in 2005. Luckily, as much as the web makes circulating lies easy, it also makes finding them out easy too.

Thanks to Snopes for this expose.

Muslims Out of Australia!

Claim:   Article compiles statements from Australian government officials about Sharia law and Muslim extremists.
Example:   [Collected via e-mail, 2005]

Muslims Out of Australia!
CANBERRA AUSTRALIA: Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks. A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown.

Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that australia was a secular state and its laws were made by parliament. “If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you,” he said on national television. “I’d be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia, one the Australian law and another the Islamic law, that is false.

If you can’t agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to other country which practices it, perhaps, then, that’s a better option,” Costello said. Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country.

Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should “clear off”. “Basically, people who don’t want to be Australians, and they don’t want to live by Australian values and understand them, well then they can basically clear off,” he said. Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation’s mosques.

  Variations:   A January 2008 variant combined elements of this piece with a 2001 editorial about immigrants written by a U.S. Air Force veteran, creating the misleading impression that the hybrid version reflected a speech given by Australian prime minister John Howard. A February 2009 variant attributed the entire combined version to Kevin Rudd, who succeeded John Howard as Australia’s prime minister in 2007.

Origins:   The July 2005 London Tube bombings raised domestic terrorism concerns in countries with large immigrant Muslim populations, such as Australia. The following month, Australian prime minister John Howard held a two-hour summit with moderate Muslim leaders in Canberra to work on a national strategy for addressing intolerance and the promotion of violence, during which issues such as the curriculum of Islamic schools and suggested measures for vetting imams were discussed. The Christian Science Monitor noted of the event:

As other governments have found, however, deciding who represents the Muslim community can be a delicate matter. Large sections of the youth, as well as conservative and more critical clerics, have been left out of Howard’s summit – meaning some of the government’s more aggressive proposals may meet resistance.

But the groups who attended the meeting hailed it as a successful first step in an ongoing dialogue.

“We determined along with the prime minister that there must be more communication between the government and Islamic schools where it comes to teaching common values like democracy, fairness, tolerance and so on, and radicals will be reacted to, whenever they make inflammatory remarks,” says Ali Roude, the acting president of the New South Wales Islamic Council.

“It’s much worse for us now, because 7/7 showed the world that the enemy is to be found within” instead of 9/11 when the terrorists were all foreigners [said the spokesperson for Lebanese Muslims in Australia]. “Now they are suspicious of all of us, and it’s very serious, but the prime minister is only playing politics.”

But some Muslims here have a growing sense that they are being defined within the media by the voices of the extremists, and that an intervention by the government and moderate Muslims to counter such elements would be useful.

“So far it was OK to do your own thing. But if the media is focusing on the extreme elements, we need to do something about it,” says Chabaan Omran, a senior member of the Federation of Australian Students and Youth, an organization that gives religious advice and teaching to young people. “Muslims need to interact more with mainstream Australia.”

This might sit well with recent calls from ordinary Australians asking Muslims to assimilate. But Mr. Omran is worried about the connotations of the word “assimilate,” and talks more of “positive integration without undermining our religion.”

Prime Minister Howard also publicly announced his intent to have Australian intelligence agencies target mosques and Islamic schools in an effort to “stamp out homegrown terrorism and extremists”:

Prime Minister John Howard said on top of trying to promote Australian values in Islamic schools, the Government would monitor what was said in certain schools and mosques to ensure they did not foster terrorism.

Asked whether he was prepared to “get inside” mosques and schools to ensure there was no support for terrorism, Mr Howard was blunt.

“Yes, to the extent necessary,” Mr Howard told Southern Cross radio.

“I have no desire and nor is it the Government’s intention to interfere in any way with the freedom or practice of religion.

“We have a right to know whether there is, within any section of the Islamic community, a preaching of the virtues of terrorism, whether any comfort or harbour is given to terrorism within that community.”

The issue of the integration of Muslims into Australian society prompted controversial remarks by some Australian cabinet ministers, such as this exchange between Treasurer Peter Costello and host Tony Jones on the Lateline television news program on 23 August 2005:

TONY JONES: Now, over the past 24 hours you’ve been repeating the notion that migrants, evidently Islamic migrants, who don’t like Australia, or Australian

 

values, should think of packing up and moving to another country. Is that a fair assessment?

PETER COSTELLO: What I’ve said is that this is a country, which is founded on a democracy. According to our Constitution, we have a secular state. Our laws are made by the Australian Parliament. If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you. This is not the kind of country where you would feel comfortable if you were opposed to democracy, parliamentary law, independent courts and so I would say to people who don’t feel comfortable with those values there might be other countries where they’d feel more comfortable with their own values or beliefs.

TONY JONES: It sounds like you’re inviting Muslims who don’t want to integrate to go to another country. Is it as simple as that?

PETER COSTELLO: No. I’m saying if you are thinking of coming to Australia, you ought to know what Australian values are.

TONY JONES: But what about if you’re already here and you don’t want to integrate?

PETER COSTELLO: Well, I’ll come to that in a moment. But there are some clerics who have been quoted as saying they recognise two laws. They recognise Australian law and Sharia law. There’s only one law in Australia, it’s the Australian law. For those coming to Australia, I think we ought to be very clear about that. We expect them to recognise only one law and to observe it.

Now, for those who are born in Australia, I’d make the same point. This is a country which has a Constitution. Under its Constitution, the state is secular. Under its constitution, the law is made by the parliament. Under its Constitution, it’s enforced by the judiciary. These are Australian values and they’re not going to change and we would expect people, when they come to Australia or if they are born in Australia, to respect those values.

TONY JONES: I take it that if you’re a dual citizen and you have the opportunity to leave and you don’t like Australian values, you’re encouraging them to go away; is that right?

PETER COSTELLO: Well, if you can’t agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country which practises it, perhaps then that’s a better option.

TONY JONES: But isn’t this the sort of thing you hear in pubs, the meaningless populism you hear on talkback radio? Essentially, the argument is if you don’t like it here, you should go back home.

PETER COSTELLO: No. Essentially, the argument is Australia expects its citizens to abide by core beliefs – democracy, the rule of law, the independent judiciary, independent liberty. You see, Tony, when you come to Australia and you go to take out Australian citizenship you either swear on oath or make an affirmation that you respect Australia’s democracy and its values. That’s what we ask of people that come to Australia and if they don’t, then it’s very clear that this is not the country – if they can’t live with them – whose values they can’t share. Well, there might be another country where their values can be shared.

TONY JONES: Who exactly are you aiming this at? Are you aiming it at young Muslims who don’t want to integrate or are you aiming it at clerics like Sheikh Omran or Abu Bakr both from Melbourne?

PETER COSTELLO: I’d be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia, one the Australian law and another the Islamic law, that that is false. It’s not the situation in Australia. It’s not the situation under our Constitution. There’s only one law in Australia. It’s the law that’s made by the Parliament of Australia and enforced by our courts. There’s no second law. There’s only one law that applies in Australia and Australia expects its citizens to observe it.

Likewise, Education minister Dr. Brendan Nelson offered his opinion that those who do not accept and teach Australian values should leave the country:

Dr Nelson says those who do not accept and teach Australian values should “clear off”.

One of the recommendations at Prime Minister John Howard’s terrorism summit was for Islamic schools to be encouraged to denounce extremism and teach about Australian traditions and culture.

The Minister says it is important for all groups to be integrated into the Australian community, whatever their religion.

“If you want to be an Australian, if you want to raise your children in Australia, we fully expect those children to be taught and to accept Australian values and beliefs,” he said.

“We want them to understand our history and our culture, the extent to which we believe in mateship and giving another person a fair go, and basically if people don’t want to support and accept and adopt and teach Australian values then, they should clear off.”

The individual statements attributed to Australian government officials included in the e-mail reproduced at the head of this page are thus essentially accurate, but the selectively-quoted excerpts of controversial material from different news stories create the misleading overall impression that Australia enacted a formal policy to force some Muslim groups out of the country. The statements quoted were part of the public debate over an issue that flared briefly in the immediate aftermath of the London Tube bombings, then quietly subsided.

Subsequent versions of this item have been altered to replace the names of out-of-office politicians with their modern counterparts (e.g., Kevin Rudd for John Howard), thereby attributing words and thoughts to people who did not express them.

Last updated:   24 February 2009

The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/australia.asp

Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2009 by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson.

  Sources:

    Kremmer, Janaki.   “Australia Meets with Muslim Leaders to Root Out Extremism.”

    The Christian Science Monitor.   25 August 2005   (p. 11).

    Osborne, Paul.   “Feds Plan to Target Mosques.”

    Geelong Advertiser.   25 August 2005.

    ABC News Online.   “Minister Tells Muslims: Accept Aussie Values or ‘Clear Off’.”

March 18, 2009

Glad tidings for asylum seekers

Filed under: asylum — nayano @ 2:52 pm
Tags: ,

Wonderful news today: all detention debts are to be scrapped, except for people smugglers (there’s that word again!) and illegal fishermen.

 As Andrew Bartlett says ‘congratulations must go to Minister Evans’ for this long awaited and humane decision: The Migration Amendment (Abolishing Detention Debt) Bill 2009. Detention debt regime to be scrapped 

Not only did asylum seekers suffer, sometimes for many years, in immigration detention, but if they were determined not to have acceptable claims to asylum they were deported with massive debts – paying for prison, in effect.

 These debts were truly massive – many hundreds of thousands of dollars in most cases. A more appropriate use of the word, I think, than its use in the Australian.

 In reporting the arrival of a boatload of asylum seekers yesterday, the Australian says:

“New figures from the Immigration Department show a massive spike in the number of asylum seekers arriving in Australian waters.

The Federal Government opened the Christmas Island Detention Centre last September and the Immigration Department says that since then, more than 180 people have passed through its doors.” 

Massive? How soon will we drown in the ‘flood’?

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.