I’m not Angry, but I am frustrated.
Gary ‘Angry’ Anderson yesterday added some petrol to the fire of racism in Australia by telling a Parliamentary Inquiry that there were racial and cultural reasons behind increases in weapon assaults.
(And gave “Aussie Kids’ a strange commendation: “Aussies use their fists”.
How does he know? How does he get the confidence to make such claims? Does he have access to sources the rest of us don’t?
Of course, Andrew Bolt is always there when there is a sniff of fuel being added to a fire.
Bolt ‘just’ raises the issue, and then lets the moral panic do the talking:
“Peter of Adelaide’:
“Angry is 100% correct.
“The Vietnamese were the first in Adelaide to use weapons and the machette seemed to be the weapon of choice.
“Today it’s knives, machettes (sic) and anything else available.
“Vietnamese, Sudanese, Lebonese (sic). You name the immigrants and you will find weapons within their gangs.
Another reader supports Peter of Adelaide:
“Peter of Adelaide makes points about the propensity of ethnic groups to use weapons. Supported by statistics.”
PLEASE PLEASE tell me, where are these statistics? I really want to know. Every time I have asked police for an idea of which groups are committing crimes I am met by silence. (As it should be.)
The only statistics that I know of that are publically available are from the ABS, and they are currently from 2005, and only of ethnicity of prisoners. (If you know of any others, please tell me).
And, unfortunately for those of us who would l.ike a quick answer to these things, the frequency of incarceration does not equal the frequency of crimes committed.
To take just one example, the wealthy can hire QCs to represent their children, as in a case of friends of mine whose sons didn’t like someone’s attitude in a street one night, and ended the night by killing the guy with a tyre lever. The sons were ‘Australian’, of Anglo-Saxon descent, by the way.
‘Atatistics tell the story’ also turned up in recent discussions of the crimes against Indians. Commenters told me that the ‘statistics’ showed that the crimes were racist. But the ‘statistics’ turned out to be media reports.
Angry Anderson is clearly an idiot to say such things, and we could just write his comments off as so much hot air. But there is nothing like a ‘devil’ to increase sales of tabloid press and listeners to talkback radio. Especially if that ‘devil’ has a machete.